I've been talking about 'live' or 'quick' search for a while now. I finally got a demonstration (or maybe here if you have trouble accessing non-standard HTTP ports. There's another file you might recognize here). I'll describe that a bit, but really more interesting is what we might do next.
What you should be able to see is an index to all the records that a large public library holds in WorldCat. We've extracted all the 5-word phrases from authors, titles, statement of responsibilty, and subject fields. It's a bit of trick to get the right phrase from the right manifestation from the right work to display. We get the speed by loading all the information into memory in several flat files, and generating the screens from those.
The screen shot above, though, shows a prototype we're working on that's quite different. For one thing, most of the information is in a Pears database, although we've done a lot of precoordination to reduce retrieval time. That's working well, even though there's a lot more going on with SRU replies in XML being converted to HTML with XSLT. More important though, is the categorization we're trying to display on the left. A couple of weeks ago Lorcan suggested to Diane and I that we should try to combine the features of the Dewey Browser and Live Search. So, we've been thinking about it, and this is what we've come with so far.
As we decide what citations to display, we compute the most popular DDC categories associated with all the records that match the search. The plan is that the user can then interact with the subject categorization much like the Dewey Browser works, except that the most popular records will display as you click on the captions.
We'll see if we can make all this work. In addition to unaddressed interface issues, there are some real problems scaling this to 60+ million records while keeping the interaction 'live'. Jenny is working on this, though. Thanks, too to Ralph for database support.
--Th
Has there been any discussion about offering Live Search functionality for catalogers using Connexion?
Response:
No, sorry, no plans for that, although I have looked at it a bit.
--Th
Posted by: Bryan | May 19, 2008 at 17:03